Toby is doing fantastic work on this. Please join the work, as I have.
Children's Health Defense rolled out a campaign today with loads of materials and a great 7 minute video of RFK Jr. REALLY following the science. Here you can acces all the campaign materials:
Meryl, it seems the 50% is not only just a guidance, it is also an arbitrary level. So I think they can easily change it to approve a vaccine. There is no science to the 50%. The person who came up with that likely had 5 fingers/hand. If they had a finger missing, the guidance would have been 40% ...
But it is not just the 50% standard. There is the "clear and compelling"safety and efficacy, the failure of uniform manufacturing of product, etc. The lack of severe cases to exclude vaccine-enhanced disease. Will FDA ditch all its standards?
The statute, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, comes with 238 links attached, respectively. Allow for a generous amount of time to gain a comprehensive understanding of the statute.
Innovation in Clinical Trial Design - A white paper by the EFPIA Clinical Design Taskforce on behalf of the EFPIA Clinical Research Expert Group. March 2020
On the one hand, people not having negative reactions is a good thing. However, that could be short-sighted given the longer term risks of ADE, OAS of the narrow, (Wuhan) spike protein-focused immune response of these mRNA transfections amidst a background of future viral mutations and subsequent evolutionary pressure.. It's a bit of a catch 22. If there are no obvious and relatively immediate downsides to these 'vaccines' for most people, then they will, unfortunately, continue on the current path with blissful ignorance. But if there are noticeable issues occurring for the masses in the near future, then many people will suffer, including our loved ones and friends.
"Only we can stop them from issuing that EUA" Please, tell us how to go about doing this...it seems we are running out of time..... :(
Check out this post from Utobian on substack for how to protest with email letters https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/urgent-call-to-action-2-tell-the?s=r
Toby is doing fantastic work on this. Please join the work, as I have.
Children's Health Defense rolled out a campaign today with loads of materials and a great 7 minute video of RFK Jr. REALLY following the science. Here you can acces all the campaign materials:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/health-freedom/its-time-to-follow-the-science/
Thank you for this link...I appreciate it and everything you are doing, as well. I am a big fan of your work!!! Grazie!!!
Thanks! I will!!
Meryl, it seems the 50% is not only just a guidance, it is also an arbitrary level. So I think they can easily change it to approve a vaccine. There is no science to the 50%. The person who came up with that likely had 5 fingers/hand. If they had a finger missing, the guidance would have been 40% ...
Vinu is always right.
But it is not just the 50% standard. There is the "clear and compelling"safety and efficacy, the failure of uniform manufacturing of product, etc. The lack of severe cases to exclude vaccine-enhanced disease. Will FDA ditch all its standards?
The statute, 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, comes with 238 links attached, respectively. Allow for a generous amount of time to gain a comprehensive understanding of the statute.
Innovation in Clinical Trial Design - A white paper by the EFPIA Clinical Design Taskforce on behalf of the EFPIA Clinical Research Expert Group. March 2020
https://www.efpia.eu/media/547507/efpia-position-paper-innovation-in-clinical-trial-design-white-paper.pdf
Whats labs got to do with it - April 2021
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjN_I3WoND2AhVWDkQIHQ29CqUQFnoECBYQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcliac%2Fdocs%2Fapril-2021%2F2_cliac-april-2021-meeting-transcript.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0S5XXMOG37eNrWBOLu4SHF
A dozen pages of footnotes - May 2020
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi2-eaEwOT2AhUeD0QIHfGZBTkQFnoECBEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdpmc.govt.nz%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2F2021-12%2FPMCSA-20-09_COVID-19-vaccines-07-09-2020-v2.pdf&usg=AOvVaw13TDn1u6BEehfF_QBSQmmJ
On the one hand, people not having negative reactions is a good thing. However, that could be short-sighted given the longer term risks of ADE, OAS of the narrow, (Wuhan) spike protein-focused immune response of these mRNA transfections amidst a background of future viral mutations and subsequent evolutionary pressure.. It's a bit of a catch 22. If there are no obvious and relatively immediate downsides to these 'vaccines' for most people, then they will, unfortunately, continue on the current path with blissful ignorance. But if there are noticeable issues occurring for the masses in the near future, then many people will suffer, including our loved ones and friends.