Isn't it the heat from a jet engine, reacting to the super-cold atmosphere at high altitudes, which makes the condensation trails? Where I live, passenger jets are seen very rarely, They're always very high. I've noticed that contrails do form a ways back from the actual aircraft, which can just barely be seen. It will remain as a "trail…
Isn't it the heat from a jet engine, reacting to the super-cold atmosphere at high altitudes, which makes the condensation trails? Where I live, passenger jets are seen very rarely, They're always very high. I've noticed that contrails do form a ways back from the actual aircraft, which can just barely be seen. It will remain as a "trail" for about 50 plane lengths, then it simply vanishes.
Back in Sacramento valley, the sky would sometimes be criss-crossed with chem trails. They'd bleed and spread and join one another, giving the sky a sick gray color, but not dissipate.
Go and avail yourselves of Dane' Wigington's article re HIGH BYPASS TURBOFAN JET ENGINES and read THE REAL SCIENCE. It's only been up on his geoengineeringwatch.org website explaining WHY condensation DOES NOT FORM for, oh, maybe five years or more now.
While what Dane writes is ever so true, and scientific, I will add that it does not conflict with my views or what I have personally witnessed, both from the time as a young kid, to a decade or so ago, when the "conspiracy theory" began to cause people to look up. As I clearly stated in the post, there was a Jet, very high which flew over and left a trail, but being conscious of chem-trails, I watched carefully, and it dissipated just as fast as the jet was traveling. The "ice" or whatever it is warmed up and simply disappeared. That's just a guess, but what I consider as fact, is that there was no chemtrail being released from the jet. In fact, the contrail did not begin forming until about a full jet-length after. That should "avail" for the clearing up of any misguided assumptions you might have, or any misunderstanding as to what I posted.
Some people cherry-pick when they listen or read. They grasp certain words and formulate a hypothesis from them without carefully tying the words to each other for their intended meaning. I'm sure you have met some like that.
Dane's info was straight up front when Googled. He must be a highly qualified tech guy. I will be reading some of the stuff from his site. No argument foreseen.
Isn't it the heat from a jet engine, reacting to the super-cold atmosphere at high altitudes, which makes the condensation trails? Where I live, passenger jets are seen very rarely, They're always very high. I've noticed that contrails do form a ways back from the actual aircraft, which can just barely be seen. It will remain as a "trail" for about 50 plane lengths, then it simply vanishes.
Back in Sacramento valley, the sky would sometimes be criss-crossed with chem trails. They'd bleed and spread and join one another, giving the sky a sick gray color, but not dissipate.
"Don't Just Spray 'Em.......Barium!
Ray
Go and avail yourselves of Dane' Wigington's article re HIGH BYPASS TURBOFAN JET ENGINES and read THE REAL SCIENCE. It's only been up on his geoengineeringwatch.org website explaining WHY condensation DOES NOT FORM for, oh, maybe five years or more now.
While what Dane writes is ever so true, and scientific, I will add that it does not conflict with my views or what I have personally witnessed, both from the time as a young kid, to a decade or so ago, when the "conspiracy theory" began to cause people to look up. As I clearly stated in the post, there was a Jet, very high which flew over and left a trail, but being conscious of chem-trails, I watched carefully, and it dissipated just as fast as the jet was traveling. The "ice" or whatever it is warmed up and simply disappeared. That's just a guess, but what I consider as fact, is that there was no chemtrail being released from the jet. In fact, the contrail did not begin forming until about a full jet-length after. That should "avail" for the clearing up of any misguided assumptions you might have, or any misunderstanding as to what I posted.
Some people cherry-pick when they listen or read. They grasp certain words and formulate a hypothesis from them without carefully tying the words to each other for their intended meaning. I'm sure you have met some like that.
Dane's info was straight up front when Googled. He must be a highly qualified tech guy. I will be reading some of the stuff from his site. No argument foreseen.
Thanks for the tip,
R