*Please make them stop the insanity of using nearly all newborns as guinea pigs.* CDC's ACIP today voted unanimously to give a monoclonal antibody to newborns on day 1-7 of life to prevent RSV.
*Please make them stop the insanity of using nearly all newborns as guinea pigs.* CDC's ACIP today voted unanimously to give a monoclonal antibody to newborns on day 1-7 of life to prevent RSV.
MORE babies DIED who were TREATED than were in the control group. Same story as Pfizer's initial COVID shot trial. This will almost certainly kill many babies.
Stop going to the hospitals to have babies delivered and deliver them at home in a water bath with a midwife in attendance. Stop going to a pediatrician or hospital with your baby! (unless it's an emergency you can't handle). If they want to force shots of any kind, walk out and find another doctor.
I wonder if we could get an injunction against use of this product (the goal is to start using it in October) on the basis that there is evidence of more deaths and no evidence it saves lives?
Would some reps care? Can states refuse to cover it under Medicaid?
It’s not about saving lives! It’s about maximizing the profitability of creating vaccines of marginalized value! The real answer is top notch prenatal care which trumps the injection of 72 vaccines in a child’s life! Ooops .. no money made by prevention!
How would a parent keep this away from their infant if they give birth in a hospital? The mother cannot have physical possession of her newborn 24/7 after the moment of birth. Can it be refused and what would the parents have to do to ensure it is not given?
Brilliant analysis of a horrific tale. These people must know exactly what they are doing, the FCA board must all be guilty of murdering babies, again. There is not enough money in the world to make me kill babies, they do it for a few thousand greasy bucks.
You are such an intelligent, medically educated, experienced MD and psychologically positive & sweet soul.
But can you see that it’s NOT “INSANE” if that these “things going on” IS their INTENT (for Agenda 2030) to eliminate BILLIONS of populations here on ‘their’ “Elite’$ Earth” ! ?
Damn ! I wish the word “elite” wasn’t being used to hide CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATHS demonstrating INTENTS to profiteer while surfing on humanity’s “waves to the graves.”
This is absolutely awful and continues the immoral poisoning of children by the vaccine religious zealots.
Even adult COVID patients and their doctors were reckless in using MABs, when much safer COVID treatments were being used successfully all over the world.
My daughter has an 8.5-month-old and adheres to the CDC vaccine schedule.
The topic of vaccines is too explosive to discuss so I wrote her two e-mails and one letter. The brain washing is so complete. The subject of vaccines is so verboten it's impossible to genuinely share information without rancor. I live three hours away and have seen the baby twice. The CDC has not released new statistics regarding chronic disease in children since 2006. Why? I'm guessing the number would be closer to 70 percent. Chronic disease has gone from 6 percent in 1960 to 54 percent in 2006. Why are people resistant to this information?
"4 million babies are born yearly in the US. 20,000 die in their first year. RSV kills 0.125% of them."
It is meaningless to contrast the number of infant deaths from RSV with total number of infant deaths. This is like correlating deaths from car crashes with deaths from some infection. The only figure that counts when considering prevention for RSV IS RSV deaths, which is a miniscule 0.000625% of infants each year! And they want to risk killing a whole bunch of babies for an infection that kills 0.000625%??? Are they NUTS? Well, yes. Of course they are!
Plus, if babies had adequate vitamin D, and were given high-dose intravenous vitamin C upon diagnosis, they probably wouldn't lose ANY of them!!!!!
I am out of words for this big pharma madness and FDA corruption!
'There is already resistance in RSV strains to this product, and so as it gets used, the resistant strains will outperform the susceptible ones, and the RSV ecology is likely to change'
Oh goody a possible drug resistant RSV. Just what we need!
On top of this news there is this news coming from the UK where Moderna is asking for kids to take part in a trial for which Moderna booster works best for kids.
According to 3 laws there it is illegal for any company to run trials on kids when there is no benefit.
What’s next…everyone has to take chemotherapy just in case they get cancer some time in their life? Will drug companies ever have to do long term studies again or is everything just going to rushed to market and the hell with safety? Isn’t that what they have been doing anyway? Remember how hard it was to get Vioxx off the market? Even though it had killed over a hundred thousand people!
'an imbalance in deaths'... what in the actual f*** are these people thinking? I would like someone to ask them if they would give it to their OWN child or grandchild.
Stop going to the hospitals to have babies delivered and deliver them at home in a water bath with a midwife in attendance. Stop going to a pediatrician or hospital with your baby! (unless it's an emergency you can't handle). If they want to force shots of any kind, walk out and find another doctor.
We Americans so need to take back control of our health and that of our families.
I wonder if we could get an injunction against use of this product (the goal is to start using it in October) on the basis that there is evidence of more deaths and no evidence it saves lives?
Would some reps care? Can states refuse to cover it under Medicaid?
It’s not about saving lives! It’s about maximizing the profitability of creating vaccines of marginalized value! The real answer is top notch prenatal care which trumps the injection of 72 vaccines in a child’s life! Ooops .. no money made by prevention!
How would a parent keep this away from their infant if they give birth in a hospital? The mother cannot have physical possession of her newborn 24/7 after the moment of birth. Can it be refused and what would the parents have to do to ensure it is not given?
This is a dystopian nightmare.
Brilliant analysis of a horrific tale. These people must know exactly what they are doing, the FCA board must all be guilty of murdering babies, again. There is not enough money in the world to make me kill babies, they do it for a few thousand greasy bucks.
These people are evil and have no regard for human life. It’s all about money!
Dear Meryl,
You are such an intelligent, medically educated, experienced MD and psychologically positive & sweet soul.
But can you see that it’s NOT “INSANE” if that these “things going on” IS their INTENT (for Agenda 2030) to eliminate BILLIONS of populations here on ‘their’ “Elite’$ Earth” ! ?
Damn ! I wish the word “elite” wasn’t being used to hide CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATHS demonstrating INTENTS to profiteer while surfing on humanity’s “waves to the graves.”
They can never back off until they can't get money for any of these "products".
Removing the blanket liability waiver would make this unprofitable, and would allow discovery in the ensuing lawsuits.
;-(
This is absolutely awful and continues the immoral poisoning of children by the vaccine religious zealots.
Even adult COVID patients and their doctors were reckless in using MABs, when much safer COVID treatments were being used successfully all over the world.
What will it take for arrests and prosecutions of these witch doctors? Seriously!
My daughter has an 8.5-month-old and adheres to the CDC vaccine schedule.
The topic of vaccines is too explosive to discuss so I wrote her two e-mails and one letter. The brain washing is so complete. The subject of vaccines is so verboten it's impossible to genuinely share information without rancor. I live three hours away and have seen the baby twice. The CDC has not released new statistics regarding chronic disease in children since 2006. Why? I'm guessing the number would be closer to 70 percent. Chronic disease has gone from 6 percent in 1960 to 54 percent in 2006. Why are people resistant to this information?
"4 million babies are born yearly in the US. 20,000 die in their first year. RSV kills 0.125% of them."
It is meaningless to contrast the number of infant deaths from RSV with total number of infant deaths. This is like correlating deaths from car crashes with deaths from some infection. The only figure that counts when considering prevention for RSV IS RSV deaths, which is a miniscule 0.000625% of infants each year! And they want to risk killing a whole bunch of babies for an infection that kills 0.000625%??? Are they NUTS? Well, yes. Of course they are!
Plus, if babies had adequate vitamin D, and were given high-dose intravenous vitamin C upon diagnosis, they probably wouldn't lose ANY of them!!!!!
I am out of words for this big pharma madness and FDA corruption!
'There is already resistance in RSV strains to this product, and so as it gets used, the resistant strains will outperform the susceptible ones, and the RSV ecology is likely to change'
Oh goody a possible drug resistant RSV. Just what we need!
On top of this news there is this news coming from the UK where Moderna is asking for kids to take part in a trial for which Moderna booster works best for kids.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/and-so-it-continues-children-offered
According to 3 laws there it is illegal for any company to run trials on kids when there is no benefit.
What’s next…everyone has to take chemotherapy just in case they get cancer some time in their life? Will drug companies ever have to do long term studies again or is everything just going to rushed to market and the hell with safety? Isn’t that what they have been doing anyway? Remember how hard it was to get Vioxx off the market? Even though it had killed over a hundred thousand people!
I immediately noticed that SIDS, (VAXX-caused) was very high on the list! :-(
'an imbalance in deaths'... what in the actual f*** are these people thinking? I would like someone to ask them if they would give it to their OWN child or grandchild.